Legend: Upper graph of each pair is motor speed V (proportional to edot); lower graph is load (in volts). Translate motor V to edot thus: V0.02 ≈ 3e-7/s . Load to stress translation for ice687 is roughly 0.25 MPa/mV, with a 5 mV zero offset. Horizontal scale is time. 5000 ≈ 14 hrs. |
|
|
|
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.114 |
Tues afternoon. End step (3) at 5% additional strain. edot chart started to show acceleration--so there was some worry about mechanical instability--but then it dropped down again.
Weds a.m., about to start step (4), and the jacket developed a leak. The bulging jacket around the bottom end cap (rightmost photos above) was worrisome.
|
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.097 |
Tues 2/26/13 midday. Step (3) underway. Steady and significant strain hardening for first ~3% strain has leveled off over the past hour at 1.8e-6/s. 10x increase in strain rate for 1.5x increase in stress =>n ≈ 5.5. What is going on in this stuff? Might be interesting to go back to step (2) condition after this for a clue about the cause of the extended transient and the high n: a big change wrt step (2) usually means the existence of back stress (e.g., from elevated dislocation density); a small change suggests a mechanism change between (2) and (3). |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.066 |
Mon morning 2/25/13. End step (2b). edot ~1.8e-7/s over past 12 hrs. Sample comes out now for shape measurements.
Quick length change measurements on images above say the ratio of avg strain rates on top T and bottom B samples is 1.42. Diameter measurements say the T/B stress ratio (=1/area ratio) was 1.16 at the start of deformation (and not much different, 1.18 at the end). This ratio of conditions in the T and B samples is represented in the working plot above by the short slanted line through the two points plotted at mean conditions.
If T and B are rheologically identical, then n =log(1.42)/log(1.16) = 2.1. On the other hand, if T and B have the same n=4 as run 687 but have different pre-exponentials, then the strain rate ratio should have been 1.16^4 = 1.8; the fact that it was 1.42 would mean the B material is stronger than the T at these conditions. |
.thb.jpg) |
e-0.059 |
Late Sunday. Continue step (2b). edot ~1.5e-7 |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.053 |
Sun late morning. After backing off piston for zero check of force gage (was ok), continue step as (2b). After 60-90 mins, edot has settled back to where it left off. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.052 |
Sun 2/24/13 morning. End step (2). edot still close to 2e-7/s, slight to no strain hardening over past 24 hrs. The first ~4 hrs of this 12+ hour record actually show a small amount of strain softening. May not be significant given ±0.2 K T variation and other extraneous things. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.043 |
Sat evening. Step (2) continues. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.039 |
Sat, midday. Step (2) continues, as does strain hardening. Avg edot since previous shot 2.1e-7/s. This is now only 3x faster than at the end of step (1), meaning apparent n < 4. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.034 |
Sat 2/23/13 am, ~13 hrs later. Steady work hardening. edot averaged 3.3e-7/s over first ~6 hrs of this trace, 2.8e-7/s over most recent 6 hrs. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.020 |
Fri ~1800 hrs. Start step (2), which takes off way faster than expected, 4.6e-7/s over the 2nd half (~past 2 hrs) of trace. 6x increase in edot for only a 33% increase in stress => n > 6! |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.013 |
Fri ~6 hrs later, end step (1). edot 7.4e-8/s over past 6 hrs. This edot is way to slow to get to 5% by Mon am; brief email discussion about raising s in next step... |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.012 |
Fri 2/22/13 early. Step (1) continues. edot ~2x slower than expected, slight but steady strain hardening throughout. |
.thb.jpg) |
e=0.007 |
Thurs 2/21/13 pm. Step (1) underway. Currently somewhere in the neighborhood of 4e-7/s at 210 K and 6 MPa. Differential stress in the DLG portion is roughly 15% lower. Ignore the bounce in the stress in the lower trace as I work through some LN difficulties. |
|
|
Check out early start at ~2.4 MPa, through pt. ~600. edot ≈ infinity^-1. |